HU Jing,ZHANG Hui-na,WANG Hong,et al.Application of comprehensive evaluation methods in efficacy evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,42(05):482-486.
HU Jing,ZHANG Hui-na,WANG Hong,et al.Application of comprehensive evaluation methods in efficacy evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2023,42(05):482-486. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2023.05.005.
Application of comprehensive evaluation methods in efficacy evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine
Clinical efficacy is the foundation of the inheritance and development of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The lack of efficacy evaluation methods recognized by both Chinese and western medicine is still an urgent issue to be solved. Comprehensive evaluation method is a kind of method for multiple indicators of a complex system.According to different evaluation purposes, it utilizes various attribute information of the evaluated object and use scientific evaluation methods to conduct an objective, fair and reasonable comprehensive comparison, judgment and sequencing process for the evaluated object. It can combine multiple dimensional outcomes such as western medicine-related outcomes, TCM-related syndromes, and quality of life into a single-dimensional comprehensive index,which can reflect the advantages of the multi-target and multi-dimensional efficacy of TCM, and has been gradually applied to the clinical efficacy of TCM in recent years. This article introduces the principles of several comprehensive evaluation methods commonly used in the field of traditional Chinese medicine, and specific examples of their application in the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM and matters needing attention. We hope to help TCM researchers to correctly select and use comprehensive evaluation methods in order to provide methodological support for the comprehensive and objective evaluation of the true clinical efficacy of TCM.
关键词
综合评价法随机对照试验中医药疗效评价
Keywords
Comprehensive evaluation methodrandomized controlled trialstraditional Chinese medicineefficacy evaluation
LI B,GAO HY,GAO R,et al.Joint development of evidence-based medical record by doctors and patients through integrated Chinese and Western medicine on digestive system diseases[J].Chin J Integr Med,2016,22(2):83-87.
HU J,LIU S,LIU W,et al.Establishing an evaluation mode with multiple primary outcomes based on combination of diseases and symptoms in TCM clinical trials[J].Ann Transl Med,2017,5(21):420.
RAUCH G,JAHN-EIMERMACHER A,BRANNATH W,et al.Opportunities and challenges of combined effect measures based on prioritized outcomes[J].Stat Med,2014,33(7):1104-1120.
郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法及拓展[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:59.
NURIA R,JEROME M,LEONIDE C,et al.IBQS:A synthetic index of soil quality based on soil macro-invertebrate communities[J].Soil BiolBiochem,2011,43(10):2032-2045.
LIBERATORE MJ,NYDICK RL.Wash criteria and the analytic hierarchy process[J].Comput Oper Res,2004,31(6):889-892.
VIDAL L,MARLE F,BOCQUET J.Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects[J].Expert Syst Appl,2011,38(5):5388-5405.
TOWHIDI N,TAVAKKOLI-MOGHADDAM R,PEYMANDAR M.Iron-making technology selection using a fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS method[J].J Iron Steel Res Int,2009,162(2):1039-1044.