1.北京小汤山医院药剂科,北京 102211
2.首都医科大学附属北京中医医院临床药学科,北京 100010
陈尚岳,男,33岁,硕士,主管中药师。研究方向:中药调剂、中药鉴定及药事管理。
郭桂明,E-mail:ggmjq@sina.com
扫 描 看 全 文
陈尚岳,邹凤丹,纪亚明,等.不同炮制方法的路路通饮片中路路通酸含量比较研究[J].北京中医药,2022,41(12):1377-1380.
CHEN Shang-yue,ZOU Feng-dan,JI Ya-ming,et al.Comparative study on the content of lipuidambaric acid in Fructus Lipuidambaris pieces with different processing methods[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,41(12):1377-1380.
陈尚岳,邹凤丹,纪亚明,等.不同炮制方法的路路通饮片中路路通酸含量比较研究[J].北京中医药,2022,41(12):1377-1380. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2022.12.012.
CHEN Shang-yue,ZOU Feng-dan,JI Ya-ming,et al.Comparative study on the content of lipuidambaric acid in Fructus Lipuidambaris pieces with different processing methods[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2022,41(12):1377-1380. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2022.12.012.
目的,2,探讨不同炮制方法对路路通饮片中路路通酸含量的影响。,方法,2,取路路通原药材500 g,按北京、福建、上海、湖北、江西等5个地区炮制规范中的方法分别炮制100 g,采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC-ELSD)测定炮制后路路通饮片中路路通酸的含量。,结果,2,方法学验证结果显示路路通酸的进样量在0.822~4.108 μg与峰面积呈良好的线性关系;重复性实验RSD为1.02%;稳定性实验RSD为0.45%;平均加样回收率99.19%,RSD为1.91%(,n,=6),结果表明检测方法具有较好的准确性、重复性、稳定性。按北京、福建、上海、湖北、江西5个地区不同的炮制方法炮制的路路通饮片中路路通酸的含量分别为0.268 6%、0.272 8%、0.241 7%、0.270 6%、0.239 0%,均符合药典要求。,结论,2,不同方法炮制的路路通饮片中路路通酸含量均符合药典要求,按福建炮制方法炮制的路路通饮片所含路路通酸含量最高,按江西炮制方法炮制的路路通饮片所含路路通酸含量最低。
Objective,2,To discuss the influence of different processing methods on the content of the liquidambaric acid in Fructus Liquidambris pieces.,Methods,2,A total of 500 g original medicinal slices of Fructus Liquidambris were divided into 5 equal parts, and then processed according to the methods used in Beijing, Fujian, Shanghai, Hubei and Jiangxi with five local processing specifications respectively, and the content of liquidambaric acid in Fructus Liquidambris pieces was determined by HPLC-ELSD.,Results,2,Methodological verification results showed that there was a good linear relationship between the injection amount of Liposolic acid and the peak area in the range of 0.822 ~ 4.108 μg.The RSD of repeatability experiment was 1.02%. The RSD of stability experiment was 0.45%. The average addition recovery was 99.19% and RSD was 1.91%(,n,=6).And the detection method had good accuracy, repeatability and stability. According to five different processing methods in Beijing, Fujian, Shanghai, Hubei and Jiangxi, the contents of Liquidambaric acid in the prepared pieces were 0.268 6%, 0.272 8%, 0.241 7%, 0.270 6% and 0.239 0%, respectively , which met the requirements of pharmacopoeia.,Conclusion,2,The contents of Lipuidambaric acid in different processed pieces of Lipuidambaric acid meet the requirements of Pharmacopoeia. The content of the liquidambaric acid in Fructus Liquidambris decoction pieces processed with processing method of Fujian was the highest (0.272 8%), and the content of the liquidambaric acid in Fructus Liquidambris decoction pieces processed with processing method of Jiangxi was the lowest (0.239 0%).
路路通饮片路路通酸炮制方法
Fructus Liquidambris piecesliquidambaric acidprocessing methods
国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典(一部)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:372.
封若雨, 朱新宇, 邢峰丽,等. 路路通的药理作用研究概述[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2019,25(8):1175-1178.
穆晓婷, 钱平, 蒋璐璐,等. 路路通酸对乳腺癌MCF-7细胞和宫颈癌C-33A细胞增殖的影响[J]. 实用药物与临床,2017,20(3):254-257.
杨欣欣, 张云坤, 王帅,等. 基于相关性分析的中药路路通抗肝肿瘤谱效关系研究[J]. 辽宁中医杂志,2022,49(6):159-163.
杨欣欣, 张云坤, 王帅,等. 不同产地路路通体外抗肝肿瘤作用及谱效关系[J]. 中成药,2021,43(7):1799-1804.
北京市食品药品监督管理局.北京市中药饮片炮制规范(2008年版)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2008:281.
福建省食品药品监督管理局.福建省中药饮片炮制规范(1998年版)[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1998:493-494.
上海市食品药品监督管理局.上海市中药饮片炮制规范(2008年版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2008:244.
湖北省药品监督管理局.湖北省中药饮片炮制规范(2018年版)[M].中国医药科技出版社,2018:102.
江西省食品药品监督管理局.江西省中药饮片炮制规范(2008年版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2008:356.
李瑞燕, 来丽娜, 聂磊,等. 不同炮制方法对潞党参中化学成分种类及含量的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2019,25(11):133-138.
肖小武, 周志强, 易路遥,等. GC-MS法分析不同基原、炮制方法制备的鲜竹沥中成分[J]. 中药材,2021,44(11):2624-2629.
刘杰英, 杨长福, 张明,等. 不同炮制方法对路路通中挥发性成分的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2022,50(10):152-156.
白家峰, 何晨, 张韬,等. 关于中药饮片质量标准指标成分的确定[J]. 时珍国医国药,2005(10):1052-1053.
杨清杰. 不同中药炮制方法对中药饮片临床疗效的影响[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2022,15(01):135-137.
杨阿敏.中药炮制对中药治疗效果及药物毒副反应的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2022,35(3):489-490.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构