1.徐州市中心医院麻醉科,徐州 221000
2.徐州市康复医院神经康复科,徐州 221000
昝望,男,32岁,硕士,主治医师。研究方向:临床麻醉与镇痛研究。
张璇,E-mail: 279674346@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-25,
收稿日期:2023-12-27,
移动端阅览
昝望,张璇,孙斌,等.电针术前预处理对全膝关节置换术术后镇痛效果的影响观察[J].北京中医药,2024,43(9):1019-1023.
ZAN Wang,ZHANG Xuan,SUN Bin,et al.Effect of preoperative electroacupuncture pretreatment on postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,43(09):1019-1023.
昝望,张璇,孙斌,等.电针术前预处理对全膝关节置换术术后镇痛效果的影响观察[J].北京中医药,2024,43(9):1019-1023. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2024.09.012.
ZAN Wang,ZHANG Xuan,SUN Bin,et al.Effect of preoperative electroacupuncture pretreatment on postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,43(09):1019-1023. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2024.09.012.
目的
2
观察电针术前预处理对全麻下行全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者术后镇痛的效果。
方法
2
选取2022年10月—2022年12月于徐州市中心医院首次全麻下行单侧TKA患者96例,用随机数字法将患者分为观察组、对照组,各48例。观察组给予电针预处理+局部浸润麻醉+静脉自控镇痛(PCIA),对照组给予局部浸润麻醉+PCIA。比较2组手术前后血浆缓激肽(BK)、前列腺素E
2
(PGE
2
)、P物质(SP)、β内啡肽(β-ep)、强啡肽(Dyn),术后12、24、48 h VAS评分,麻醉药物使用情况及不良反应。
结果
2
术后2组血浆BK、PGE
2
、SP、β-ep、Dyn水平与同组术前比较,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.01)。观察组血浆BK、PGE
2
、SP水平低于对照组(
P
<
0.05),β-ep、Dyn水平高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。静息VAS评分:术后12、24、48 h,2组间VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(
F
=0.694,
P
=0.406);组内各时间点VAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(
F
=256.6,
P
<
0.01)。活动VAS评分:术后12、24、48 h,2组间VAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(
F
=7.072,
P
=0.008);组内各时间点VAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(
F
=300.885,
P
<
0.01)。观察组首次按压时间晚于对照组(
P
<
0.01),PCIA总按压次数少于对照组(
P
<
0.01),补救镇痛例数少于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。观察组术后恶心、呕吐发生率低于对照组(
P
<
0.05);2组头晕、嗜睡、呼吸抑制、瘙痒发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
电针预处理可增强TKA患者术后局部浸润麻醉+PCIA的镇痛效果。
Objective
2
To observe the effect of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA) pretreatment on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under general anesthesia.
Methods
2
96 patients undergoing their first unilateral TKA under general anesthesia at Xuzhou Central Hospital were enrolled and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group according to a random table number, with 48 cases in each group. The observation group received EA pretreatment combined with local infiltration anesthesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), while the control group received local infiltration anesthesia and PCIA. Plasma levels of bradykinin (BK), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), substance P (SP), β-endorphin (β-ep), and dynorphin (Dyn) before and after surgery, and VAS scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, as well as anesthesia drug usage and adverse reactions, were compared between the two groups.
Results
2
Postoperatively, plasma levels of BK, PGE2, SP, β-ep, and Dyn in both groups differed significantly from their preoperative levels(
P
<
0.01). The observation group had lower plasma levels of BK, PGE2, and SP than the control group (
P
<
0.05), and higher levels of β-ep and Dyn (
P
<
0.05). For resting VAS scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups (
F
=0.694,
P
=0.406), but intra-group comparisons at each time point showed significant differences (
F
=256.6,
P
<
0.01). For activity VAS scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours, significant differences were observed between the groups (
F
=7.072,
P
=0.008), and intra-group comparisons at each time point also showed significant differences (
F
=300.885,
P
<
0.01). The observation group had a later first press time than the control group (
P
<
0.01), fewer total PCIA presses(
P
<
0.01), and fewer cases requiring additional analgesia, though this difference was not statistically significant(
P
>
0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the observation group than the control group(
P
<
0.05), but there were no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness, drowsiness, respiratory depression, or itching between the two groups(
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
EA pretreatment enhances the analgesic effect of local infiltration anesthesia combined with PCIA in patients undergoing TKA.
全膝关节置换术电针局部浸润麻醉静脉自控镇痛炎症反应术后镇痛
Total knee arthroplastyelectroacupuncturelocal infiltration anesthesiapatient-controlled intravenous analgesiainflammatory responsepostoperative analgesia
MOORE A, ECCLESTON C, GOOBERMAN-HILL R. "It's not my knee": understanding ongoing pain and discomfort after total knee replacement through re-embodiment[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2022,74(6):975-981.
章明星, 郭义, 石田寅夫,等. 电针干预周围神经损伤效应及机制的研究[J]. 世界中医药,2020,15(7):1003-1007.
陈达, 盛东, 徐景利,等. 电针对全膝关节置换术后患者的辅助镇痛效应及对血清β-内啡肽及前列腺素E2水平的影响[J]. 中国针灸,2019,39(3):247-250.
万丽,赵晴,陈军,等.疼痛评估量表应用的中国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(3):177-187.
中国中西医结合学会麻醉专业委员会, 甘肃省中西医结合学会麻醉专业委员会. 穴位刺激辅助治疗术后疼痛临床实践指南(2021)[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志,2021,41(10):1159-1165.
LIU S, WANG Z, SU Y, et al. A neuroanatomical basis for electroacupuncture to drive the vagal-adrenal axis[J]. Nature, 2021,598(7882):641-645.
CHOPRA S, GIOVANELLI P, ALVARADO-VAZQUEZ PA, et al. IRE1α-XBP1 signaling in leukocytes controls prostaglandin biosynthesis and pain[J]. Science, 2019,365(6450):eaau6499.
PETHO G,REEH PW.Sensory and signaling mechanisms of bradykinin, eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor, and nitric oxide in peripheral nociceptors[J]. Physiol Rev, 2012,92(4):1699-1775.
ZIEGLGÄNSBERGER W. Substance P and pain chronicity[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2019,375(1):227-241.
LUO MF, DONG XT, SONG XJ, et al. Study on the dynamic compound structure composed of mast cells, blood vessels, and nerves in rat acupoint[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2013:160651.
赵雪, 郭义, 郭永明,等. 针刺穴位效应启动的初始动力学调控机制[J]. 世界中医药,2020,15(7):997-1002.
CAMERON MA,ABED AAL,BUSKILA Y,et al.Differential effect of brief electrical stimulation on voltage-gated potassium channels[J].J Neurophysiol,2017,117(5):2014-2024.
HAN CX,WANG J,CHE YQ. Nonlinear characteristics extraction from electrical signals of dorsal spinal nerve root evoked by acupuncture at zusanli point[J]. Acta Physica Sinica,2010,59(8):5880-5887.
BAGLEY EE,INGRAM SL.Endogenous opioid peptides in the descending pain modulatory circuit[J].Neuropharmacology,2020,173:108131.
AL-KARAGHOLI MA, OLESEN J, ASHINA M. Reply: Hyperpolarization through ATP-sensitive potassium channels; relevance to migraine pathology[J]. Brain, 2020,143(2):e14.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备 11010102006710号