
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国中医科学院广安门医院ICU,北京 100053
2.中国中医科学院广安门医院急诊科,北京 100053
3.中国中医科学院广安门医院综合科,北京 100053
4.中国中医科学院广安门医院护理部,北京 100053
张萃,女,47岁,本科,主管护师。研究方向:重症患者护理与中医护理学研究。
王学勤,E-mail:164123836@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2024-11-25,
收稿日期:2024-05-14,
移动端阅览
张萃,杨金亮,徐霞,等.改良俯卧位通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者氧合指数及皮肤压力性损伤的效果观察[J].北京中医药,2024,43(11):1266-1270.
ZHANG Cui,YANG Jinliang,XU Xia,et al.Effect of modified prone position ventilation on oxygenation index and skin pressure injury in ARDS patients undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,43(11):1266-1270.
张萃,杨金亮,徐霞,等.改良俯卧位通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者氧合指数及皮肤压力性损伤的效果观察[J].北京中医药,2024,43(11):1266-1270. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2024.11.009.
ZHANG Cui,YANG Jinliang,XU Xia,et al.Effect of modified prone position ventilation on oxygenation index and skin pressure injury in ARDS patients undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2024,43(11):1266-1270. DOI: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2024.11.009.
目的
2
评估改良俯卧位通气(PPV)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)机械通气患者氧合指数及皮肤压力性损伤的影响。
方法
2
选择2022年12月1日—2023年6月30日中国中医科学院广安门医院ICU收治的56例ARDS患者为研究对象,根据俯卧位通气治疗方式的不同分为常规组、改良组,各28例;根据治疗时间又各分为6 h组和12 h组,各14例。常规组每隔2 h改变头部方向1次,治疗结束后还原平卧位;改良组每隔2 h交替翻身,治疗结束后还原平卧位。对比各组干预前后氧合指数、压力性损伤发生率、压力性损伤严重程度。
结果
2
各组干预后氧合指数均高于干预前,改良12 h组、常规12 h组干预前后氧合指数,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);改良6 h组、常规6 h组干预前后氧合指数,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。常规组与改良组压力性损伤发生率比较,常规组压力性损伤发生率92.86%(26/28)高于改良组的67.86%(19/28),差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);常规6 h组、常规12 h组、改良6 h组、改良12 h组压力性损伤发生率分别为85.7%(12/14)、100%(14/14)、57.14%(8/14)、78.57%(11/14),各组间对比,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。常规6 h组、常规12 h组、改良6 h组、改良12 h组压力性损伤压力性损伤发生部位分别为21、58、14、36处,评分分别为(1.71±1.33)、(7.14±3.21)、(1.43±1.55)、(3.14±2.11)分。常规组压力性损伤评分(7.35±3.92)分高于改良组的(4.00±1.45)分,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);12 h组压力性损伤发生部位数量、压力性损伤评分均高于6 h组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);常规12 h组压力性损伤评分高于改良12 h组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);常规6 h组压力性损伤评高于改良6 h组,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
PPV干预12 h可有效改善ARDS患者的氧合指数,但长时间PPV增加了压力性损伤的风险;改良后的PPV可减少因长时间PPV而造成的压力性损伤。
Objective
2
To evaluate the effect of modified prone position ventilation (PPV) on oxygenation index and skin pressure injury in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Methods
2
A total of 56 ARDS patients treated in the ICU of Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, from December 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, were selected. According to the mode of PPV treatment, patients were divided into a conventional group and a modified group, with 28 patients in each group. Each group was further divided based on treatment duration into 6-hour and 12-hour subgroups, with 14 patients in each subgroup. The conventional group changed the head position every 2 hours, returning to the supine position after treatment. The modified group alternated turning every 2 hours and also returned to the supine position after treatment. The oxygenation index, incidence of pressure injuries, and severity of pressure injuries were compared before and after the intervention.
Results
2
After intervention, the oxygenation index in all groups was higher than that before the intervention. The improvement in the oxygenation index in the modified 12-hour group and conventional 12-hour group showed statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the oxygenation index of the modified 6-hour group and conventional 6-hour group (
P
>
0.05). As indicated by the comparison of the incidence of pressure injuries between the conventional and modified groups, the conventional group had a significantly higher incidence (92.86%,26/28) than the modified group (67.86%,19/28)(
P
<
0.05). The incidence rates of pressure injuries in the conventional 6-hour group, conventional 12-hour group, modified 6-hour group, and modified 12-hour group were 85.7% (12/14),100%(14/14),57.14%(8/14), and 78.57%(11/14), respectively, with no significant differences between groups(
P
>
0.05). The number of pressure injury sites in the conventional 6-hour group, conventional 12-hour group, modified 6-hour group, and modified 12-hour group were 21, 58, 14, and 36, respectively. The pressure injury scores were(1.71±1.33),(7.14±3.21),(1.43±1.55),and(3.14± 2.11), respectively. The pressure injury score in the conventional group was(7.35±3.92), significantly higher than (4.00±1.45) in the modified group (
P
<
0.05). In the 12-hour groups, the number of pressure injury sites and the pressure injury scores were significantly higher than those in the 6-hour groups(
P
<
0.05). The pressure injury score in the con
ventional 12-hour group was higher than that in the modified 12-hour group (
P
<
0.05). The pressure injury score in the conventional 6-hour group was higher than that in the modified 6-hour group, but the difference was not statistically significant (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
A 12-hour PPV intervention can effectively improve the oxygenation index in ARDS patients. However, prolonged PPV increases the risk of pressure injury. The modified PPV mode can reduce pressure injury caused by long-term PPV.
压力性损伤改良俯卧位通气机械通气急性呼吸窘迫综合征
pressure injurymodified prone position ventilationmechanical ventilationacute respiratory distress syndrome
GATTINONI L, BUSANA M, GIOSA L, et al. Prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2019,40(1):94‑100.
DOUGLAS IS, ROSENTHAL CA, SWANSON DD, et al. Safety and outcomes of prolonged usual care prone position mechanical ventilation to treat acute coronavirus disease 2019 hypoxemic respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care Med,2021,49(3):490-502.
桂新星,刘荣,王敏华,等.全身麻醉喉罩通气在俯卧位胸腰椎骨折内固定手术中的应用研究[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(4):447-450.
林亚芬,郭秀林,庄江兰.早期俯卧位通气联合营养支持在儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J].西藏医药,2022,43(1):112-114.
隋博文,李明爽,任聪林,等.从肺损络伤探讨急性呼吸窘迫综合征中医治疗进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2019,21(1):18-20.
范平,石俊,陆杉,等.俯卧位通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后影响的荟萃分析[J].中国急救医学,2014(4):302-309.
蒋燕,陆叶,蒋旭琴,等.成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者俯卧位通气管理的最佳证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(15):1878-1885.
周建珍,张传来,郑秋兰.集束化护理对减少ARDS俯卧位通气病人并发症的效果分析[J].全科护理,2017,15(9):1028-1031.
中华医学会重症医学分会.急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(12):706-710.
赵俊红,余凌飞.改良俯卧位方式和传统俯卧位方式在重症医学科俯卧位患者皮肤保护中的护理效果[J].医学理论与实践,2021,34(12):2156-2157.
王泠.2014版国际《压疮预防和治疗:临床实践指南》解读[J].中国护理管理,2016,16(5):577-580.
唐敏,李娜.急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病机制及相关生物标志物的研究进展[J].中国现代医学杂志,2022,32(5):1-6.
SCHOLTEN EL, BEITLER JR, PRISK GK, et al. Treatment of ARDS with prone positioning[J]. Chest, 2017,151(1):215-224.
中华医学会呼吸病分会呼吸危重症医学学组.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气指南[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(6):404.
国家卫生健康委员会,国家中医药管理局.新型冠状病毒感染重症病例诊疗方案(试行第四版)[J].中国病毒病杂志,2023,13(2):111-114.
李经纬.中医大词典[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:1463.
蒋琪霞,瞿小龙,王建东,等.减压装置用于重症患者压力性损伤预防效果的系统评价[J].中国护理管理,2015,15(6):695-699.
GIRARD R,BABOI L,AYZAC L. The impact of patient positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial on prone positioning[J].Intensive Care Med, 2014,40(3):397.
PANCORBO-HIDALGO PL, GARCIA-FERNANDEZ FP, LOPEZ-MEDINA IM, et al. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcerprevention: a systematic review[J]. Adv Nurs, 2016,54(1):94-110.
OHURA N, ICHIOKA S, NAKATSUKA T, et al. Evaluating dressing materials for the prevention of shear force in the treatment of pressure ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2015,14(9):401-404.
石福霞,张素秋,樊艳美,等.压力性损伤中医标准预防护理方案对压力性损伤风险患者预防价值的随机对照研究[J].北京中医药,2017,36(11):1032-1035.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备 11010102006710号